The Death of Critical Thinking in the Movement, Part 3

This week I’m talking about just what the title says — the death of critical thinking in the patriot movement.  Today we’re going to look at the third belief, and judging by the reactions of some folks on social media when I even bothered to broach the subject, my take on this topic isn’t going to be popular.

We’ve already talked about how like/dislike tends to color how we process information. The next belief we’ll discuss is another two-fold idea that requires a disregard of reality, and it goes as follows:

If I tell you that the actions I engage in constitute patriot awesomeness, then it is so.

The corollary to this is:

If I cannot see evidence of your patriot awesomeness, it isn’t happening.

In the first statement there’s a certain arrogance, and it shows itself as defiance or being overly defensive. People who ask questions that are uncomfortable — such as “what exactly were you trying to prove while standing on a street corner at a parade looking like you just robbed Frank’s Military Surplus and Tent Shop?” or “Where exactly are all the donations you collected going?” — are instantly branded as bullies. How dare you question my patriotism or my devotion to the cause, is how the defense generally goes.

Unfortunately, just as telling people you’re a unicorn doesn’t make you one, insisting that your actions bring honor and praise to the liberty cause doesn’t make it so. The good news is that whether or not you’re actually doing some good isn’t based upon my opinion, or yours, or the guy you made sure to bring to your shindig to take pics for social media. It can be evaluated objectively and logically. What a concept, right?

Like it or not, there’s a sort of mental checklist that needs to be gone over while planning some kind of ‘patriot action.’ Chances are good that most groups don’t do this. How do I know? Because they still end up out there performing the action.

  • Will this action further the cause? Or will it harm it? — Your action, above all, should reflect positively on the cause.  A few ideas I’ve seen are Adopt-a-Highway efforts, taking a Christmas box to needy kids, or simply spending your free time talking to your neighbors and creating a solid, self-reliant environment. Not everything is about ‘gunz n stuff.’ Malheur, Charlottesville, Minnesota, Alabama — over and over, people step out into incoming traffic and think no car will hit them.  They get in front of microphones and cameras and think they can control the outcome. They keep appealing to people who want all of us unarmed, imprisoned, or even dead and think they’ll be the ones to change their mind. It’s like watching a woman with a ‘bad boy’ she’s in love with; she knows he’s horrible for her, she knows it won’t end well, but she does it anyway because she thinks her love will change him. Same thing in the movement. Remember the definition of insanity?
  • Will the public largely support the action, or will this act undermine public support for the cause? Sadly, Malheur wins again for Best Example. As I’ve said before, if Twitter starts calling you Y’allQaeda, while people who actually believe in liberty are disassociating because they aren’t down with the whole “mission from God” thing, it’s safe to say you aren’t winning the public support battle on either side of the fence.  If your activities result in your own side performing a collective facepalm, you might be on shaky ground.
  • If I am arrested will it be part of the operation, and does it have a plan and support system already in place?  Again, don’t run headlong into some action screaming the camo version of “Banzai!” and expect it to go well. And if you’re going to get arrested, that should have been part of the plan, and you should already have a support team and plan in place.  If your arrest was an “oh crap” moment that suddenly required your family to barely scrape by without your income and beg from strangers, while your group has to go without whatever skills you brought to the table, you failed.

Keep in mind that these are only a few of the many considerations that need to go into performing an action.  The actual list is much longer, but common sense should tell you what needs to be on it. It’s a logical conclusion that if the three questions above don’t have positive answers, the action being considered is actually not going to have the effect you want — or desperately believe it will.

Now that 99% of readers have stomped off in a huff, let’s tackle the corollary. There’s this idea that ‘real’ patriots are loud, they’re in your face, they’re “wearing the lifestyle” on their T-shirts and vehicles and street corners.  There’s such a thing as the “silent professional,” however, and quite a few folks should learn about it. JC Dodge points out how it’s NOT done. People who believe point #1 usually also believe point #2, and the second half of the “you can’t judge me” defense usually includes a reference to how “I didn’t see YOU at X activity,” because as logic will tell you, if you didn’t attend said activity, you don’t get to say anything about it.

…except no, logic will not tell you that.

If you can’t imagine engaging in any kind of action without posting on Facebook that you did it, then your motivation is off.  If you actually start calling people “keyboard commandos” simply because they didn’t stand on the street corner with you, you might want to stop and think about what you’re doing, and what your gut-level reasons are for doing it.  And if you’re so insecure that you need to block anyone on social media who has the balls to ask you questions as opposed to simply kissing your posterior and petting your ego, then you’re a coward. It’s that simple.

Since this post is part of a series on critical thinking, let’s do some of that. What are some of the logical possibilities behind someone not advertising their particular actions for the liberty cause — besides the accusation that they’re lazy slobs who just like to “bully others?”

– Their support is financial and behind the scenes (although God knows a lot of folks need to shout their donation history too)

– The type of work they do necessitates silence (there’s a whole list of things that could come under this heading).

– They prefer not to be recognized, or understand that if they were, their ability to keep performing that work would end.

– Their motivation is not personal attention.

Granted, there are some folks whose entire function in the movement is to sit on Facebook or various websites and yap. That’s true. But there are plenty who are involved in activities at all levels of the game, and don’t give a rat’s rectum if you know and approve of them.  In fact, I’d argue that the people behind the scenes, as a rule, are getting far more done than the people who think they need to show up at every public gathering looking like they put on every piece of gear they owned.

As the saying goes, it’s amazing how much you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit. There is an incredible amount of work to be done, and most of it is done behind the scenes, by people who don’t need your validation.

Do you engage in activities where no one knows you were there? Can you contribute in ways that will never get you recognized or that you can’t ever post about on social media or give interviews about? If not, you might want to take a look at what’s driving you — because it’s not liberty.

Tomorrow in the last installment of this series we’ll look at what critical thinking is, and how to apply it to the movement. That is, if you’re still reading. 😉

2 Replies to “The Death of Critical Thinking in the Movement, Part 3”

  1. Kit, I ran across this by accident, but it is superb. Not because I foam at the mouth when I see gun-store commandos, or guys kitted out in the “Spec Ops” look, but because it is so bloody logical and right.

    While I _might_ “hold my manhood cheap” for not being there to support the Bundy family ( and be incensed at what happened to LaVoy Finicum after the Malhuer Mistake), it really is imperative that we behave in a calm, controlled manner that doesn’t detract from the message we need to send, and that we remain low-key when it behooves us to accomplish things in a quiet manner – with no message desired or evident to anyone.

    Calm, reasonable spokesmen, and invisible “grey men” should be the kind of people who populate our movement. Even when things “go loud”, as they might, eventually. Let’s pray they don’t, but be prepared for when they might.

    Thanks for your clear thinking about these issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *