RFID drinks and more. My first story on Medium explores some things you might not know about — and seeks to explain the bigger picture to an audience that probably doesn’t want to hear it.
In 1978, Sir John Glubb wrote a paper entitled The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival. While many in the so-called ‘patriot movement’ have read it, far more have not — and that’s a shame, because reading it will show you something that will affect your entire mindset. Well, if you’re open to things like truth, it will. And it’s freely available, so you don’t really have an excuse.
Fate of Empires shows a very disturbing truth about what happens to the great empires (or superpowers, if the term ’empire’ somehow offends you if applied to the US). While I know some of you have read it, I’m going to assume that some of you haven’t, so I’ll recap. From the introduction:
The experiences of the human race havebeen recorded, in more or less detail, forsome four thousand years. If we attempt tostudy such a period of time in as manycountries as possible, we seem to discoverthe same patterns constantly repeated underwidely differing conditions of climate,culture and religion.
I think we can all agree that humans are cyclical creatures — we tend to repeat the same mistakes over and over as a society and as a greater humankind.
I know you think that American exceptionalism makes us immune to such things, but stay with me.
The entire crux of Glubb’s research can be summed up in two major points. First, the chart below:
Do you see a trend? Let me spell it out for you. Every single empire in recorded human history fell at an age of 200-250 years. This occurred irrespective of era, tech, culture, education, or military capability. He didn’t even count the ones that are mentioned primarily in the Bible, or he’d have had a few more to add to the list.
How is this possible? These empires, regardless of environment, all lasted about 9-10 generations.
Glubb goes into the second commonality between all of these historical ‘master nations’ — they all followed an identical progression of stages, and while they may have ultimately ended due to invasion or financial ruin or cultural failure, they all followed the same progression.
- The Age of Pioneers (outburst)
- The Age of Conquests
- The Age of Commerce
- The Age of Affluence
- The Age of Intellect
- The Age of Decadence
How do you know a country has reached the age of decadence? You see the following indicators:
- An influx of foreigners
- The Welfare State
- A weakening of religion
So where, pray tell, do you think the United States is on that timeline? If you need me to tell you THAT, you’re probably on the wrong site.
I told you all of that to tell you this:
If Glubb’s research is correct (and I see no reason to think it is not), then the United States as you know it will cease to exist in the next nine years, maximum.
Now, before you start screaming about Constitutions and militias and all the amazing, ballsy things you plan to do for liberty, consider the following:
1. A 30-second perusal of what’s going on in this country right now will tell you that we are so deep into the Decadence age that we are on the tail end of it.
2. If you spend a fair amount of objective time and effort looking deeper than the regurgitated lies and narrative forced on you by the media, then you probably understand that the fall of the United States has already begun, and is actually in full swing.
Several people who know enough to intelligently discuss the matter see Balkanization as a very real probability.
Some of you might think, “well YEAH, let’s get our secession on!” That might be fine and awesome if you live in a place where you and people like you are the majority — and even then you’ll have a very sporting time. But what about the folks who are deep in ‘enemy territory,’ like California or New England?
I’ve been told that it’s cowardly to possess the viewpoint that the USA is lost. My lack of hope and belief in the ability to return to “the things that made America great” is a downer for some, who insist that the wrongs can be righted and the phoenix of individual liberties will rise again from the ashes or something. I do believe that individual liberty could rise again. I just also paid attention to the “ashes” part that comes first.
Here’s the thing. It’s not cowardly to assess the situation and understand it for what it is, rather than what we want or even need it to be. If anything, being able to set emotion aside and objectively see the predicament we’re in makes you better prepared to deal with it.
If you insist on believing that there is hope for this carcass of a nation, because militias and Constitutional rights, then you haven’t been paying attention nearly as well as you think. There are a few things you need to understand.
a) The Constitution, while brilliant in its time, is dead. It is largely ignored in the courts and on the streets. This is evident by watching the shenanigans in Nevada, or the protests in which cops are ordered to allow and even encourage violence. It’s obvious in the fact that when some cops do choose to become tyrants, they often do so with the tacit approval of their departments, who either look the other way or award them for their actions. In fact, the very people who are supposed to defend you in this corrupt system, are currently calling for gun confiscation and ex parte orders. Yes, the American Bar Association, many of whom are criminal defense lawyers, want your guns taken away.
b) The surveillance state is complete. You cannot hide from it anymore, unless you are willing to engage in a lifestyle that is painstakingly annoying and lacking in technology — and even then, you can’t hide completely because eventually you have to use a piece of societal infrastructure. This means that unless you are engaging in a very specific type of action, in a very specific kind of way, bolstered by a very specific level of tradecraft, they will always know what you’re doing before you do it — and if the current situation is any indication, they’ll already have someone near you to ‘help’ you do it whether you were actually doing it or not.
c) Your absolute, core level, most important job in this nation is to raise and train the next generation. If you have kids and you’re setting them aside to run all over the countryside “defending freedom” then you are abdicating your biggest role — and your kids will grow up not even understanding what the point was. Teaching your kids that “Daddy’s missing your birthday because he’s defending liberty at a rally” is NOT the same as sitting down with them every day and training them to think critically, to be self-sufficient, to understand what the principles of liberty are, and to have the intestinal fortitude to act with grace, courage, and strength in a world gone mad. If you’re a parent, that’s your first, top, most critical purpose. As a friend of mine says: It’s “God, family, THEN country.” You can go to every rally imaginable — but if your kids aren’t getting raised in the truth, then what you’re doing is all for nothing because they won’t be able to carry it on — and they won’t have the balls to do it even if they manage to pick up the concept.
d) Going to a protest and acting like you have the authority of the cops or military is not the same as deploying as the military or working as a cop. Some might say they are “assisting law enforcement,” but if you haven’t been given authority, you don’t have any — and while it does happen, it’s certainly not the norm. Showing up to a rally that isn’t even yours, looking like you just crawled out of a surplus clearance sale doesn’t give you authority. In fact, if you roll up to a rally armed and dressed like you’re about to take Fallujah, you’re no different than Antifa — you just have better patches and a rifle instead of a club. And who do you think will be seen as the bigger threat — the kids with clubs, rage, and the support of the media and half of the powers that be? Or the guys who look like they have a Charles Whitman fantasy and just need a tower?
e) You and your friends will not somehow overcome a trend that has been present in all of recorded human history. I hate to say it, but it’s true. All your flags and camo gear and standing at rallies will not change the cycle of all humanity. If every single empire that has ever stood ended in 250 years at the most, what in God’s green earth makes you so arrogant as to think that you will somehow be the exception to the rule? Oh, that’s right — you have God on your side, yes? That’s the difference? Here’s the brutal truth. Solomon’s empire was the strongest, richest, and even wisest of all. He had everything, including the blessing of the Almighty, and his countrymen thrived under his rule — until that sentence you see over and over in Old Testament era history: “Every man did what was right in his own eyes.” That sentence always signaled the end, because it means the society in question had reached the age of decadence. And it always comes — because humans are all the same.
All of this adds up a very simple fact: You can’t stop the tsunami that is coming; you’re not going to be able to “restore” anything. You can, however, shift your mindset to preparing for how to survive it, as opposed to failed attempts at preventing it. You can make it through the storm, come out the other side, and possibly start something even better — unless you’re in jail or dead, of course, which is where it seems the movement is hell-bent on getting to, and the gov is all too happy to oblige.
You can stand on a street corner at a rally with your camo, shemagh and patches all flipping day but if your kids aren’t getting trained, you’re failing. If you’re too busy running your mouth on Facebook and posting memes to read the books that will educate you, and train your mind, you’re failing. If you’ve got every piece of military gear known to man but you haven’t the faintest idea how to be sustainable without the food/water/power infrastructure, you’re failing. And if you’re on food stamps or government assistance because you can’t support your family, but you’ve got money to go to rallies, you are the ultimate failure, because you preach a doctrine of self-determination that you cannot even bother to live by.
Let’s STOP failing, and let’s stop pretending. Prep for the situation that IS, not the one you desperately want it to be.
As if you needed another reason not to fly anymore. Must read.
I’d love to write a long post about the background of this move, and how evil it is, but in reality the article lays it out as plainly as I could have. it is every bit as bad as you think, and far worse.
The bottom line here is that there is no escape from the surveillance state anymore. I’m not advocating that you give up trying to be private or protecting your information — it just means that you have to be very careful. Local, local, local. Old school, non-internet based comms and operations. As I said on Gab recently, if people aren’t close enough to show up in a timely manner if your house is on fire, they’re too far away for you to be coordinating activities with. If you need internet/phone to talk to them, they’re too far away.
There is nowhere you go, nothing you do online, no one you talk to on your phone that is not being listened to, tracked, and collated. Understand that.
Don’t bother with the “well, they can come GET SOME.” We are so far past the point where that sounds idiotic. There’s this defeatist idea that people might as well not even bother with privacy because the surveillance state is so entrenched, or that “if they want to be bored by my data, go ahead.”
What you don’t understand is that they aren’t bored at all. They are making decisions about you based on that data. They are making choices about your family, about how they’ll handle you, your loved ones, and your associates — whether that be next week or next year. They’re modeling your personality and deciding who’s worth approaching to turn over, who can be leveraged, where to put their infiltrators, or who needs to be simply removed. They’re predicting what you’ll do, how you think, what they can expect from you. Some of that data you can’t help giving them because you drive on roads, you get picked up on cameras, etc. But the rest of it? You give it to them.
You’re talking about a government who collectively did not blink before putting a bullet in a woman’s head while she held her baby, who didn’t think twice about putting a shape charge on a room filled with women and children. Who have done even worse than that. Do you really think they’ll have a problem with using your data against you if it’s advantageous to them?