Anonymous Twitter Account, Part 2

For some reason people have a hard time wrapping their heads around the idea of an anonymous Twitter account. The standard naysayers came out all over the web on the various sites who linked to my article, casting doubt and dispersion about whether it was even possible. So consider this a followup, for those who didn’t bother to actually read the article at the Intercept, and just went off of the headline.

The naysayers are correct in that your computer will give you away. That’s why you don’t use YOUR computer. Don’t use the laptop that is resting on your belly while you sit in your recliner. Don’t use your phone — especially the so-called ‘burner phone’ that you (foolishly) carry around in the same pocket as your regular phone. Don’t use the same desktop where you pen your ‘militia roll calls’ on Facebook or share your memes. Don’t use the computer of anyone you know.

Instead, you go get a cheap refurb computer, that has never connected to your home or work internet (or your favorite coffee shops and hangouts). You never use it at work or home, or anywhere else you frequently go. You use a VPN, you use Tor, and you make accounts that aren’t linked to you in any way.  You use email addresses created and accessed only on that laptop, only when on VPN, only on Tor, only when not home.

On top of all of that, you don’t drive your own car to wherever you’re going to set up, because you don’t want a license plate reader picking it up and putting you in that location at that time. Don’t wear your loud-and-proud gear. Dress to fit in and disappear inside whatever area you’re in.  If that means you dress like a hipster and blend into some eclectic little vegan shop with wifi, then so be it. Don’t use the same location over and over. Don’t become recognizable and memorable. For the love of all that’s holy, don’t take your cell phone with you. In fact, send it with someone else going another direction if you have to.

If you’re going to do it right, you wouldn’t follow anyone you know with your account, anyone you would normally follow, or who would follow you. Your entire function is PUSHING information, and so you wouldn’t respond to direct messages, click on links, or do anything else that detracts from your actual function.

Gee, you might be thinking. That sounds like a big pain in the rear end. A lot of trouble and annoyance, or even money.  Yup. That’s exactly what it is. Do you want to do it and get caught? Or do you want to do it correctly?

That’s why agitators and activists — the real ones — are so few and far in between. Because doing it right requires a lot more work than sharing memes on Facebook.

How to Run an Anonymous Account on Twitter

The Intercept has a fantastic write-up from front to back on how to create and maintain an anonymous Twitter account.

A lot of folks prefer not to use social media at all, and that’s fine.  For those staying completely under radar (as in, not posting anywhere), that’s no big deal. For those who understand the principles of propaganda and information operations, however, this is excellent information. Run several of them.

Social media like Facebook and Twitter, for agitators and activists, can be one of the more productive battlespaces — not for the standard chest-beating and trash-talking, but for more underhanded tactics of thread takeovers, topic steering, and other fun activities. Learn how to do it right, then go do it. Just make sure you’re covering your rear end.

Hint: The other side has been doing it effectively for decades. Take a page from their playbook. Just because they hate you doesn’t mean they have nothing to teach you.

Silencing Your Voice Part 1: Facebook

Today begins a three-part series in which I examine how social media like Facebook and search engines like Google seek to not only silence you if you’re not part of the Borg, but actually force-feed you their narrative.

The problem is not just that Facebook censors content, although it does; it’s a multifaceted issue, brought about partly by the fact that many misunderstand what the First Amendment protects, and what Facebook’s obligations are to the public. Add in Facebook’s leftist leadership, and their known propensity for stifling conservative and libertarian thought, and the result is a perfect storm, in which misunderstandings about freedom of speech are juxtaposed with Facebook’s leftist agenda.

The First Amendment’s provisions – freedom of religion, speech, assembly, petition, and the press – all have one thing in common; they are referring to a government-citizen relationship.  The amendment does not, as many believe, create a free-for-all where anyone can say anything without consequence.  In our personal lives, the things we say and do have repercussions; we all censor ourselves on a daily basis at our jobs and in our relationships; we do this not because we have to, but because we choose to, because it’s the responsible thing to do. The difference between individuals and Facebook, however, is that in our personal lives, we make that choice based on our own morals, our own beliefs, or the situation at hand. On Facebook, a faceless, nameless algorithm — or a human who disagrees with your viewpoints — makes the decision for you, based upon their morals, politics, and personal mood.